Re: [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Fri Mar 11 2011 - 10:48:28 EST
On 03/11/2011 12:33 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:29:38AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Also, I don't think your patch is correct. Even if there is phys_dist
> ^
> no
>> table, emu distance tables should be built because emulated nids don't
>> map to physical nids one to one. ie. Two different emulated nids can
>> share a physical node and the distance table should explicitly reflect
>> that.
ok, when original SLIT is not there, mean only one really node.
so the new distance table should be filled with LOCAL_DISTANCE.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/