Re: [GIT] Networking

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:17:54PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 13:01 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:48:23 -0500
> > 
> > > As with the above, it'd make the history a little more self-documenting.
> > 
> > Once there is even one single commit after the buggy one, this is
> > simply impossible since the hashes of subsequent commits depend upon
> > the precise contents of the original one.
> 
> I think Bruce is suggesting that the fix is committed on a branch from
> the broken commit, then merged into whatever branches need it.  I'm not
> sure how much that helps, though.  The merge could then involve forward-
> porting (as opposed to the current situation where fixes are cherry-
> picked and possibly back-ported).

Yeah, there could be merge conflicts.

But assume you only did this in cases where the merge was trivial.
Would it be worth it, or would people be annoyed by the additional
branching?

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/