[PATCH tip:x86/mm 2/3] x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interruptcurrent cpu
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Sat Mar 12 2011 - 06:50:55 EST
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the
address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: work/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ work/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -355,7 +355,6 @@ static void notify_thresholds(__u64 msr_
static void intel_thermal_interrupt(void)
{
__u64 msr_val;
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
@@ -367,19 +366,19 @@ static void intel_thermal_interrupt(void
CORE_LEVEL) != 0)
mce_log_therm_throt_event(CORE_THROTTLED | msr_val);
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PLN))
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PLN))
if (therm_throt_process(msr_val & THERM_STATUS_POWER_LIMIT,
POWER_LIMIT_EVENT,
CORE_LEVEL) != 0)
mce_log_therm_throt_event(CORE_POWER_LIMIT | msr_val);
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PTS)) {
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTS)) {
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
if (therm_throt_process(msr_val & PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS_PROCHOT,
THERMAL_THROTTLING_EVENT,
PACKAGE_LEVEL) != 0)
mce_log_therm_throt_event(PACKAGE_THROTTLED | msr_val);
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PLN))
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PLN))
if (therm_throt_process(msr_val &
PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS_POWER_LIMIT,
POWER_LIMIT_EVENT,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/