Re: [PATCH 3/3] vhost-net: use lock_sock_fast() in peek_head_len()

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Sun Mar 13 2011 - 13:41:46 EST


Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 Ã 18:43 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin a Ãcrit :
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 05:32:07PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 Ã 18:19 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin a Ãcrit :
> >
> > > Other side is in drivers/net/tun.c and net/packet/af_packet.c
> > > At least wrt tun it seems clear socket is not locked.
> >
> > Yes (assuming you refer to tun_net_xmit())
> >
> > > Besides queue, dequeue seems to be done without socket locked.
> > >
> >
> > It seems this code (assuming you speak of drivers/vhost/net.c ?) has
> > some races indeed.
> >
>
> Hmm. Any more besides the one fixed here?
>

If writers and readers dont share a common lock, how can they reliably
synchronize states ?

For example, the check at line 420 seems unsafe or useless.

skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/