Re: [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v14

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:40:29PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> These patches are an attempt to allow platforms to share clock code. At
> present, the definitions of 'struct clk' are local to platform code,
> which makes allocating and initialising cross-platform clock sources
> difficult, and makes it impossible to compile a single image containing
> support for two ARM platforms with different struct clks.
> 
> The three patches are for the architecture-independent kernel code,
> introducing the common clk infrastructure. The changelog for the first
> patch includes details about the new clock definitions.
> 
> Many thanks to the following for their input:
>  * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>  * Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
>  * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Ryan Mallon <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  * Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx>
>  * Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

who is responsible to take this patch?  Russell?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/