Re: [PATCH 2/3 for 2.6.38] oom: select_bad_process: ignore TIF_MEMDIEzombies
From: David Rientjes
Date: Mon Mar 14 2011 - 16:50:22 EST
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> select_bad_process() assumes that a TIF_MEMDIE process should go away.
> But it can only go away it its parent does wait(). Change this check to
> ignore the TIF_MEMDIE zombies.
>
The equivalent of this change would be to set TIF_MEMDIE for all threads
in a thread group when choosing a process to kill; as we've already
discussed in your first series of patches, that has the risk of fully
depleting memory reserves and causing the kernel the deadlock. We want to
limit TIF_MEMDIE to an oom killed task or to current when it is responding
to a SIGKILL or already in the exit path because we know it's exiting and
without memory reserves it may never exit.
This patch is even more concerning, however, because select_bad_process()
isn't even guaranteed to select a thread from the same thread group this
time.
> Note: this is _not_ enough. Just a minimal fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- 38/mm/oom_kill.c~2_tif_memdie_zombie 2011-03-14 18:51:49.000000000 +0100
> +++ 38/mm/oom_kill.c 2011-03-14 18:52:39.000000000 +0100
> @@ -311,7 +311,8 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
> * blocked waiting for another task which itself is waiting
> * for memory. Is there a better alternative?
> */
> - if (test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE))
> + if (test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE) &&
> + !p->exit_state && thread_group_empty(p))
> return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
>
> /*
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/