Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] memcg: add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty limits
From: Mike Heffner
Date: Tue Mar 15 2011 - 10:01:13 EST
On 03/11/2011 01:43 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
Add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty page limits:
Direct write-out is controlled with:
- memory.dirty_ratio
- memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes
Background write-out is controlled with:
- memory.dirty_background_ratio
- memory.dirty_background_limit_bytes
What's the overlap, if any, with the current memory limits controlled by
`memory.limit_in_bytes` and the above `memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes`? If
I want to fairly balance memory between two cgroups be one a dirty page
antagonist (dd) and the other an anonymous page (memcache), do I just
set `memory.limit_in_bytes`? Does this patch simply provide a more
granular level of control of the dirty limits?
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/