Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets

[Grant Likely]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:12:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:32:28PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> 
> > It's a different matter that DT has many hearts to win(at least in ARM
> > Linux)
> > So, perhaps the answer to Q(a) is - Yes.
> 
> It's not really a question of hearts to win.  Even for people who are
> fully won over the implementation just isn't there in mainline and it's
> not clear when it'll be delivered.  Right now device tree can only be
> used on SPARC, PowerPC and (I beleive) some x86 platforms.

MIPS and Microblaze too plus out-of-tree NIOS.

Regardless, I agree 100%.  This isn't (er, shouldn't be) a device tree
debate.  The problem does need to be solved for existing platforms.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/