Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid atomic operation intest_and_set_bit_lock if possible
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Thu Mar 24 2011 - 16:51:44 EST
Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 Ã 21:00 +0100, Ingo Molnar a Ãcrit :
> One good way to see cache bounces is to run a misses/accesses ratio profile:
>
> perf top -e cache-misses -e cache-references --count-filter 10
>
Oh well , something must be broken...
"perf top" is working here, but if I use any "-e ...." argument, it
fails :
# perf top -e cache-misses
Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 2 (No such file or directory).
/bin/dmesg may provide additional information.
Fatal: No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?
# grep PERF_EVENTS .config
CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS=y
CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y
CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI=y
Nothing in dmesg...
uname -a
Linux ed001 2.6.38-08165-g2712750-dirty #517 SMP Thu Mar 24 21:31:00 CET 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/