Re: [PATCH 0/3] cfq-iosched: Fair cross-group preemption

[Chad Talbott]

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:53:13PM -0700, Chad Talbott wrote:
>> I prefer option a) - so much so that even with the older CFQ group
>> implementation we did work to merge the RT and BE service trees to
>> achieve that behavior.  But I see that using blkio.class is a poor
>> choice of interface name.  I will rename the interface and resubmit
>> the patch series (also with Gui's suggestion to keep the "_device"
>> suffix for consistency).
>
> Do you need this feature to be global or per device or both?

Per-device.

Chad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/