Re: [PATCH] proc: constify status array

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Wed Mar 30 2011 - 06:03:36 EST


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:56, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> -static const char *task_state_array[] = {
>> +static const char * const task_state_array[] = {
>
> Why this is needed for task_state_array, but not for, say, tgid_base_stuff?

tgid_base_stuff is already declared const. which your nm output clearly shows.

> This double const is ugly.

quite the opposite. not declaring const arrays const is ugly.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/