Re: [PATCH v2] microblaze: Fix level/edge irq sensibility
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Mar 30 2011 - 08:03:59 EST
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Michal Simek wrote:
> Patches:
> "microblaze: Convert to new irq function names"
> sha (4adc192ec7d977c74c750320f289af9d61c1caca)
> and
> "microblaze: Use generic show_interrupts()"
> sha(9d61c18b25726306c9231428c17db42e3ff29ba7)
>
> should also setup edge/level in irq_set_chip_and_handler_name
> name parameter.
>
> Error log:
> ~ # cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 2: 2 Xilinx INTC-Xilinx INTC eth0
> 3: 2 Xilinx INTC-Xilinx INTC eth0
> 4: 241 Xilinx INTC-Xilinx INTC timer
> 6: 108 Xilinx INTC-Xilinx INTC serial
>
> Fixed:
> ~ # cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 2: 2 Xilinx INTC-level eth0
> 3: 2 Xilinx INTC-level eth0
> 4: 238 Xilinx INTC-edge timer
> 6: 108 Xilinx INTC-level serial
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
Should I pick that up for the urgent fixes ?
> ---
>
> v2: Fix exchanged edge and level
> ---
> arch/microblaze/kernel/intc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/intc.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/intc.c
> index 5ba7e16..c88f066 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/intc.c
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/intc.c
> @@ -158,11 +158,11 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
> for (i = 0; i < nr_irq; ++i) {
> if (intr_type & (0x00000001 << i)) {
> irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(i, &intc_dev,
> - handle_edge_irq, intc_dev.name);
> + handle_edge_irq, "edge");
> irq_clear_status_flags(i, IRQ_LEVEL);
> } else {
> irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(i, &intc_dev,
> - handle_level_irq, intc_dev.name);
> + handle_level_irq, "level");
> irq_set_status_flags(i, IRQ_LEVEL);
> }
> }
> --
> 1.5.5.6
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/