Re: [PATCH] unicore32 fix: remove arch-specific futex support

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Mar 30 2011 - 08:50:43 EST


On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Wednesday 30 March 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The problem is that you need cmpxchg in user space as well.
> >
> > ARM does this with some syscall magic for machines which do not have
> > cmpxchg.
>
> Ah, right. I wonder how sh does it.
>
> I also remember that the original unicore32 ABI had support for a cmpxchg
> system call, but that was removed with the move to the generic syscall
> table.
>
> It is of course possible to add it back using the __NR_arch_specific_syscall
> entry point.

Either that or you take a trap. None of them is pretty.

If the only purpose is futex support, then we can add an extra flag to
the futex ops and handle it there via asm-generic/futex.h. That would
avoid an extra syscall in the contended case.

Thanks,

tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/