[PATCH] [122/275] NFS: fix the return value of nfs_file_fsync()
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed Mar 30 2011 - 17:45:52 EST
2.6.35-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 0702099bd86c33c2dcdbd3963433a61f3f503901 upstream.
By the commit af7fa16 2010-08-03 NFS: Fix up the fsync code
close(2) became returning the non-zero value even if it went well.
nfs_file_fsync() should return 0 when "status" is positive.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nfs/file.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/fs/nfs/file.c 2011-03-29 22:51:19.419226280 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nfs/file.c 2011-03-29 23:03:00.750280971 -0700
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@
have_error |= test_bit(NFS_CONTEXT_ERROR_WRITE, &ctx->flags);
if (have_error)
ret = xchg(&ctx->error, 0);
- if (!ret)
+ if (!ret && status < 0)
ret = status;
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/