Re: [PATCH v2 typo-fixed] initcall: add config option for compiling initcall_debug

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, March 30, 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:51:31 +0400
> Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds bool config option CONFIG_INITCALL_DEBUG for
> > compiling initcalls debuging, it on by default to keep current behaviour.
> > 
> > With CONFIG_INITCALL_DEBUG=n bloat-o-meter shows:
> > 
> > add/remove: 0/7 grow/shrink: 3/10 up/down: 88/-1448 (-1360)
> > function                                     old     new   delta
> > device_resume                                350     404     +54
> > __device_suspend                             331     363     +32
> > device_resume_noirq                          230     232      +2
> > kernel_init                                  355     354      -1
> > initcall_debug                                 4       -      -4
> > __param_str_initcall_debug                    15       -     -15
> > dpm_suspend                                  431     415     -16
> > syscore_suspend                              280     250     -30
> > syscore_shutdown                             123      93     -30
> > __param_initcall_debug                        32       -     -32
> > syscore_resume                               215     173     -42
> > static.initcall_debug_start                   71       -     -71
> > static.initcall_debug_report                 102       -    -102
> > legacy_resume                                129       -    -129
> > async_synchronize_cookie_domain              286     152    -134
> > legacy_suspend                               135       -    -135
> > async_run_entry_fn                           348     188    -160
> > do_one_initcall                              364     197    -167
> > pm_op                                        536     366    -170
> > pm_noirq_op                                  576     366    -210
> 
> Well.  One hopes that most things which use initcall_debug are
> marked __init or __initdata.
> 
> I see that async and pm have borrowed inticall_debug for reasonably
> appropriate reasons, but I wonder if all that is permanent code, or if
> it will later get removed.  Because if it gets removed, this patch
> becomes rather pointless.

This is permanent code, as far as PM is concerned.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/