Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
From: Scott Wood
Date: Fri Apr 08 2011 - 12:00:53 EST
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:14:06 -0500
Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If someone was going to seriously go about doing something like this, a
> better approach would be to start with QEMU and remove anything non-x86
> and all of the UI/command line/management bits and start there.
> There's nothing more I'd like to see than a viable alternative to QEMU
> but ignoring any of the architectural mistakes in QEMU and repeating
> them in a new project isn't going to get there.
Supporting only a single architecture sounds like a significant
architectural mistake... only x86 deserves clean code?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/