Re: 2.6.39-rc2 regression: X201s fails to resumeb77dcf8460ae57d4eb9fd3633eb4f97b8fb20716

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Mon Apr 11 2011 - 12:12:40 EST


On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:

> Hi Keith,
>
> On 16:13 Fri 08 Apr, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:44:51 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Can the bluetooth folks please have a look at that ASAP? The obvious
> > > fast fix for Linus tree is to revert the second hunk for now, but this
> > > needs to be fixed proper.
> >
> > Who will submit this patch? I'd rather have your name on it so that
> > people come complain at you...
>
> I took a shot at it and just sent a patch (also attached for convenience)
> that should solve the problem.

Aaarg. No. That patch reverts both hunks.

--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
@@ -586,9 +586,6 @@ static int hci_dev_do_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
hci_req_cancel(hdev, ENODEV);
hci_req_lock(hdev);

- /* Stop timer, it might be running */
- del_timer_sync(&hdev->cmd_timer);
-
if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_UP, &hdev->flags)) {
hci_req_unlock(hdev);
return 0;

As I said before you need that first hunk to stay for the case where
there is no device up and you return via the !HCI_UP check. You just
moved back to the state before as the stupid timer is active for
whatever reason even when HCI_UP is not set.

@@ -618,6 +615,9 @@ static int hci_dev_do_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
clear_bit(HCI_INIT, &hdev->flags);
}

+ /* Stop timer, it might be running */
+ del_timer_sync(&hdev->cmd_timer);
+
/* Kill cmd task */
tasklet_kill(&hdev->cmd_task);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/