Re: [PATCH] bonding:set save_load to 0 when initializing

From: Jay Vosburgh
Date: Mon Apr 11 2011 - 14:56:59 EST



>It is unnecessary to set save_load to 1 here,
>as the tx_hashtbl is just kzalloced.
>
>Signed-off-by: Weiping Pan(æåå) <panweiping3@xxxxxxxxx>

I don't think this will cause any behavioral change, but I'll
grant is more correct in intent (there's no load information to save at
this point).

Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>

>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>index 9bc5de3..ab69e5a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int tlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond)
> bond_info->tx_hashtbl = new_hashtbl;
>
> for (i = 0; i < TLB_HASH_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
>- tlb_init_table_entry(&bond_info->tx_hashtbl[i], 1);
>+ tlb_init_table_entry(&bond_info->tx_hashtbl[i], 0);
> }
>
> _unlock_tx_hashtbl(bond);
>--
>1.7.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/