Re: O_EXCL in NFSv3

From: J. R. Okajima
Date: Tue Apr 12 2011 - 08:15:40 EST

Next message: Matt Fleming: "Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86: signal: handle_signal() should usesigprocmask()"
Previous message: Matt Fleming: "Re: [PATCH 4/6] signal: sigprocmask() should doretarget_shared_pending()"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: O_EXCL in NFSv3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Trond Myklebust:
> Doesn't commit 8a0eebf66e3b1deae036553ba641a9c2bdbae678 (NFS: Fix NFSv3
> exclusive open semantics) fix this? It should be in the stable tree.

Ah, I can see the commit in v2.6.38.
So it is fixed already, sorry.
I just skipped all NFS tests for v2.6.38. due to the sillyrename
problem.
Also I know it was fixed just after v2.6.38(.0).

Thank you
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matt Fleming: "Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86: signal: handle_signal() should usesigprocmask()"
Previous message: Matt Fleming: "Re: [PATCH 4/6] signal: sigprocmask() should doretarget_shared_pending()"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: O_EXCL in NFSv3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]