Re: [PATCH] x86, ioapic: move acpi_get_override_irq to acpi.c
From: Florian Mickler
Date: Tue Apr 12 2011 - 15:54:00 EST
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:39:29 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Florian Mickler <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In order to get rid of the ugly CONFIG_ACPI ifdef, we move
> > the function acpi_get_override_irq into acpi.c and add a new
> > helper function ioapic_get_irq to io_apic.c.
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: kurup_avinash@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: maciej.rutecki@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: rjw@xxxxxxx
> > Cc: sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx
> > LKML-Reference: <1301558489-4198-1-git-send-email-florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Hi Ingo,
> > Instead of exporting find_irq_entry, irq_trigger and irq_polarity, I added a
> > new helper function 'ioapic_get_irq(..)' and exported that.
> > Also I did it as a seperate commit, since it is more of a cleanup and the other
> > commit is already tested... hope this is ok.
> Yeah, looks good in principle.
> Mind porting to the latest x86 devel tree and resend the patch? I tried to
> apply your patch but there's a conflict. You can find the tree at:
It does still apply on top of
[PATCH v2] x86, ioapic: Skip looking for ioapic overrides when ioapics
are not present (<1301621025-3858-1-git-send-email-florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>)
I'm going to send both patches as a reply to this message, since I
have updated the $subject patch to also remove the #define
acpi_get_override_irq in acpi.h ..
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/