Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Apr 14 2011 - 05:03:18 EST

On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in kernel/sched.c
> between commit 6631e635c65d ("block: don't flush plugged IO on forced
> preemtion scheduling") from Linus' tree and commits 098247b90a9e ("sched:
> Provide p->on_rq") and a3380736e4b3 ("sched: Also serialize ttwu_local()
> with p->pi_lock") from the tip tree.
> I fixed them up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

It looks like Ingo accidentially published an older version of these
patches because I also got a UP build error from Tony yesterday.

A new series was merged this morning which should hopefully address both

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at