[34-longterm 168/209] amd64_edac: Fix interleaving check

From: Paul Gortmaker
Date: Thu Apr 14 2011 - 14:10:47 EST


From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@xxxxxxx>

=====================================================================
| This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release. |
| If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.|
=====================================================================

commit e726f3c368e7c1919a7166ec09c5705759f1a69d upstream.

When matching error address to the range contained by one memory node,
we're in valid range when node interleaving

1. is disabled, or
2. enabled and when the address bits we interleave on match the
interleave selector on this node (see the "Node Interleaving" section in
the BKDG for an enlightening example).

Thus, when we early-exit, we need to reverse the compound logic
statement properly.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index c20a6c9..0e03506 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static int f10_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int dram_range,
debugf1(" HoleOffset=0x%x HoleValid=0x%x IntlvSel=0x%x\n",
hole_off, hole_valid, intlv_sel);

- if (intlv_en ||
+ if (intlv_en &&
(intlv_sel != ((sys_addr >> 12) & intlv_en)))
return -EINVAL;

--
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/