Re: [34-longterm 136/209] exec: make argv/envp memory visible tooom-killer
From: Paul Gortmaker
Date: Thu Apr 14 2011 - 15:29:33 EST
On 11-04-14 02:19 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/14, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>
>> =====================================================================
>> | This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release. |
>> | If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.|
>> =====================================================================
>> ...
>>
>> With this patch get_arg_page() increments current's MM_ANONPAGES
>> counter every time we allocate the new page for argv/envp. When
>> do_execve() succeds or fails, we change this counter back.
>
> This only works starting from 2.6.36.
>
> before 2.6.36 kernel, oom-killer's badness() uses mm->total_vm. Please
> see the patch for pre2.6.36 kernel below.
Thanks Oleg -- I see the earlier discussion about this from December
now, and will swap in the pre-36 version -- I appreciate the review.
Paul.
>
> Oleg.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> commit 3c77f845722158206a7209c45ccddc264d19319c upstream.
>
> Brad Spengler published a local memory-allocation DoS that
> evades the OOM-killer (though not the virtual memory RLIMIT):
> http://www.grsecurity.net/~spender/64bit_dos.c
>
> execve()->copy_strings() can allocate a lot of memory, but
> this is not visible to oom-killer, nobody can see the nascent
> bprm->mm and take it into account.
>
> With this patch get_arg_page() increments current's MM_ANONPAGES
> counter every time we allocate the new page for argv/envp. When
> do_execve() succeds or fails, we change this counter back.
>
> Technically this is not 100% correct, we can't know if the new
> page is swapped out and turn MM_ANONPAGES into MM_SWAPENTS, but
> I don't think this really matters and everything becomes correct
> once exec changes ->mm or fails.
>
> Compared to upstream:
>
> before 2.6.36 kernel, oom-killer's badness() takes
> mm->total_vm into account and nothing else. So
> acct_arg_size() has to play with this counter too.
>
> Reported-by: Brad Spengler <spender@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-and-discussed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> include/linux/binfmts.h | 1 +
> fs/exec.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- 2.6.35/include/linux/binfmts.h~1_acct_exec_mem 2010-03-11 13:11:50.000000000 +0100
> +++ 2.6.35/include/linux/binfmts.h 2010-12-13 12:01:22.000000000 +0100
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct linux_binprm{
> char buf[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE];
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + unsigned long vma_pages;
> #else
> # define MAX_ARG_PAGES 32
> struct page *page[MAX_ARG_PAGES];
> --- 2.6.35/fs/exec.c~1_acct_exec_mem 2010-05-28 13:41:40.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2.6.35/fs/exec.c 2010-12-13 12:00:51.000000000 +0100
> @@ -158,6 +158,21 @@ out:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>
> +static void acct_arg_size(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pages)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + long diff = (long)(pages - bprm->vma_pages);
> +
> + if (!mm || !diff)
> + return;
> +
> + bprm->vma_pages = pages;
> +
> + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + mm->total_vm += diff;
> + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +}
> +
> static struct page *get_arg_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pos,
> int write)
> {
> @@ -180,6 +195,8 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct
> unsigned long size = bprm->vma->vm_end - bprm->vma->vm_start;
> struct rlimit *rlim;
>
> + acct_arg_size(bprm, size / PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> /*
> * We've historically supported up to 32 pages (ARG_MAX)
> * of argument strings even with small stacks
> @@ -270,6 +287,10 @@ static bool valid_arg_len(struct linux_b
>
> #else
>
> +static inline void acct_arg_size(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pages)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static struct page *get_arg_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pos,
> int write)
> {
> @@ -977,6 +998,7 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm *
> /*
> * Release all of the old mmap stuff
> */
> + acct_arg_size(bprm, 0);
> retval = exec_mmap(bprm->mm);
> if (retval)
> goto out;
> @@ -1401,8 +1423,10 @@ int do_execve(char * filename,
> return retval;
>
> out:
> - if (bprm->mm)
> - mmput (bprm->mm);
> + if (bprm->mm) {
> + acct_arg_size(bprm, 0);
> + mmput(bprm->mm);
> + }
>
> out_file:
> if (bprm->file) {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/