[PATCH 3/3] x86, cpu: Change NOP selection for certain Intel CPUs
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Apr 18 2011 - 18:58:32 EST
Due to a decoder implementation quirk, some specific Intel CPUs
actually perform better with the "k8_nops" than with the
SDM-recommended NOPs. For runtime-selected NOPs, if we detect those
specific CPUs then use the k8_nops instead of the ones we would
normally use.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 2ca3f65..34bf87e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -190,7 +190,14 @@ void __init arch_init_ideal_nops(void)
{
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
- if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL)) {
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6 &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x0f &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x1c &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x26 &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x27 &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 0x30) {
+ ideal_nops = k8_nops;
+ } else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL)) {
ideal_nops = p6_nops;
} else {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/