Re: [PATCH 1/3] bitops: add ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_BIT_LE guard

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 20 April 2011, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> index 946a21b..bd2253e 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static inline unsigned long find_first_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
>  
>  #define BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE       ((BITS_PER_LONG-1) & ~0x7)
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_BIT_LE
> +
>  extern unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
>                 unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
>  extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr,
> @@ -38,6 +40,8 @@ extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr,
>  #define find_first_zero_bit_le(addr, size) \
>         find_next_zero_bit_le((addr), (size), 0)
>  
> +#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_BIT_LE */
> +
>  #else
>  #error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
>  #endif

The style that we normally use in asm-generic is to test the macro itself
for existence, so in asm-generic, do:

#ifndef find_next_zero_bit_le
extern unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
                 unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
#endif

and in the architectures, write

static inline unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
                 unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
#define find_next_zero_bit_le find_next_zero_bit_le

I guess we can do the #ifdef separately for each of the three macros,
or choose one of them to use as a key.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/