Re: [PATCH 2/3] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor outcompat/native code
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon Apr 25 2011 - 07:49:51 EST
Just one more thing.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 07:59:40PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> +int do_sigtimedwait(sigset_t *these, siginfo_t *info, long timeout)
Maybe @these isn't the base name here? It implies that these are the
signals the function is interested in but in reality it is the
negation of that. The original function should be blamed for using
the same name while negating its meaning but separating out the
function makes the inconsitency stand out.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/