Re: [PATCH 3/4] munmap: kbuild menu for munmap interface
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Mon Apr 25 2011 - 11:46:37 EST
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:44:31 +0900 Geunsik Lim wrote:
> From: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Support kbuild menu to select memory unmap operation size
> at build time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Hyunjin Choi <hj89.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memory.c | 21 +++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 56240e7..0983961 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -557,6 +557,76 @@ config LOG_BUF_SHIFT
> 13 => 8 KB
> 12 => 4 KB
>
> +config PREEMPT_OK_MUNMAP_RANGE
> + int "Memory unmap unit on preemption mode (8 => 32KB)"
> + depends on !PREEMPT_NONE
> + range 8 2048
> + default 8
> + help
> + unmap_vmas(=unmap a range of memory covered by a list of vma) is treading
unmap_vmas (= unmap a range ...
> + a delicate and uncomfortable line between hi-performance and low-latency.
high performane and low latency.
> + We've chosen to improve performance at the expense of latency.
This option improves performance at the expense of latency.
> +
> + So although there may be no need to resched right now,
reschedule
> + if we keep on gathering more and more without flushing,
gathering more and more <what> ?
> + we'll be very unresponsive when a resched is needed later on.
reschedule
> +
> + Consider the best suitable result between high performance and low latency
> + on preemption mode.
> + Select optimal munmap size to return memory space that is allocated by mmap system call.
> +
> + For example, For recording mass files, if we try to unmap memory that we allocated
for
> + with 100MB for recording in embedded devices, we have to wait for more than 3seconds to
3 seconds
(but try not to put text over 80 columns, please)
> + change mode from play mode to recording mode. This results from the unit of memory
> + unmapped size when we are recording mass files like camcorder particularly.
> +
> + This value can be changed after boot using the
> + /proc/sys/vm/munmap_unit_size tunable.
Indent above with tab + 2 spaces.
> +
> + Examples:
> + 2048 => 8,388,608bytes : for straight-line efficiency
> + 1024 => 4,194,304bytes
> + 512 => 2,097,152bytes
> + 256 => 1,048,576bytes
> + 128 => 524,288bytes
> + 64 => 262,144bytes
> + 32 => 131,072bytes
> + 16 => 65,536bytes
> + 8 => 32,768bytes : for low-latency (*default)
All of above would be better with added space before "bytes", as, e.g.:
8 => 32,768 bytes
> +
> +config PREEMPT_NO_MUNMAP_RANGE
> + int "Memory unmap unit on non-preemption mode (1024 => 4MB)"
> + depends on PREEMPT_NONE
> + range 8 2048
> + default 1024
> + help
> +
> + unmap_vmas(=unmap a range of memory covered by a list of vma) is treading
unmap_vmas (= unmap
> + a delicate and uncomfortable line between hi-performance and low-latency.
high performance and low latency.
> + We've chosen to improve performance at the expense of latency.
This option improves performance at the expense of latency.
> +
> + So although there may be no need to resched right now,
reschedule
> + if we keep on gathering more and more without flushing,
more and more what?
> + we'll be very unresponsive when a resched is needed later on.
reschedule
> +
> + Consider the best suitable result between high performance and low latency
> + on preemption mode.
but this option is for non-preempt mode... so should that text above be modified?
> + Select optimal munmap size to return memory space that is allocated by mmap system call.
> +
> + This value can be changed after boot using the
> + /proc/sys/vm/munmap_unit_size tunable.
Indent above with tab + 2 spaces.
> +
> + Examples:
> + 2048 => 8,388,608bytes : for straight-line efficiency
> + 1024 => 4,194,304bytes (*default)
> + 512 => 2,097,152bytes
> + 256 => 1,048,576bytes
> + 128 => 524,288bytes
> + 64 => 262,144bytes
> + 32 => 131,072bytes
> + 16 => 65,536bytes
> + 8 => 32,768bytes : for low-latency
Use space before "bytes" in table above, please.
> +
> #
> # Architectures with an unreliable sched_clock() should select this:
> #
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/