[PATCH 169/173] proc: do proper range check on readdir offset

[Willy Tarreau]

2.6.27.59-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit d8bdc59f215e62098bc5b4256fd9928bf27053a1 upstream.

Rather than pass in some random truncated offset to the pid-related
functions, check that the offset is in range up-front.

This is just cleanup, the previous commit fixed the real problem.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 fs/proc/base.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2806,11 +2806,16 @@ static int proc_pid_fill_cache(struct fi
 /* for the /proc/ directory itself, after non-process stuff has been done */
 int proc_pid_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldir)
 {
-	unsigned int nr = filp->f_pos - FIRST_PROCESS_ENTRY;
-	struct task_struct *reaper = get_proc_task(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
+	unsigned int nr;
+	struct task_struct *reaper;
 	struct tgid_iter iter;
 	struct pid_namespace *ns;
 
+	if (filp->f_pos >= PID_MAX_LIMIT + TGID_OFFSET)
+		goto out_no_task;
+	nr = filp->f_pos - FIRST_PROCESS_ENTRY;
+
+	reaper = get_proc_task(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
 	if (!reaper)
 		goto out_no_task;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/