Re: [PATCH] x86, vdso: SHN_LORESERVE is an inclusive lower bound

[Anders Kaseorg]

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 07:28 AM, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> > Test for >= SHN_LORESERVE instead of > SHN_LORESERVE.
> 
> Yep, seems reasonable.  Did this cause a problem, or is it just
> something you noticed?

I just noticed it (while writing âmodpost: Update 64k section support for 
binutils 2.18.50â: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1130613 ).

Anders
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/