Re: [PATCH 13/13] mm: Account for the number of times directreclaimers get throttled

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Tue Apr 26 2011 - 10:26:59 EST


On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:35:10PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:36:54 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Under significant pressure when writing back to network-backed storage,
> > direct reclaimers may get throttled. This is expected to be a
> > short-lived event and the processes get woken up again but processes do
> > get stalled. This patch counts how many times such stalling occurs. It's
> > up to the administrator whether to reduce these stalls by increasing
> > min_free_kbytes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/vm_event_item.h | 1 +
> > mm/vmscan.c | 1 +
> > mm/vmstat.c | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vm_event_item.h b/include/linux/vm_event_item.h
> > index 03b90cdc..652e5f3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vm_event_item.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vm_event_item.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ enum vm_event_item { PGPGIN, PGPGOUT, PSWPIN, PSWPOUT,
> > FOR_ALL_ZONES(PGSTEAL),
> > FOR_ALL_ZONES(PGSCAN_KSWAPD),
> > FOR_ALL_ZONES(PGSCAN_DIRECT),
> > + PGSCAN_DIRECT_THROTTLE,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_FAILED,
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 8b6da2b..e88138b 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2154,6 +2154,7 @@ static void throttle_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, struct zonelist *zonelist,
> > goto out;
> >
> > /* Throttle */
> > + count_vm_event(PGSCAN_DIRECT_THROTTLE);
> > do {
> > schedule();
> > finish_wait(&zone->zone_pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait, &wait);
> > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> > index a2b7344..5725387 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> > @@ -911,6 +911,7 @@ const char * const vmstat_text[] = {
> > TEXTS_FOR_ZONES("pgsteal")
> > TEXTS_FOR_ZONES("pgscan_kswapd")
> > TEXTS_FOR_ZONES("pgscan_direct")
> > + "pgscan_direct_throttle",
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > "zone_reclaim_failed",
>
> I like this approach. Make the information available, but don't make a fuss
> about it.
>
> Actually, I like the whole series - I'm really having to dig deep to find
> anything to complain about :-)
>
> Feel free to put
> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> against anything that I haven't commented on.
>

Thanks very much!

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/