Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: add error return when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCKis not set

[Mike Travis]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:11:37 -0500
> Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > 	Add an error return if CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK is not set instead
> > 	of having to add #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK around blocks of
> > 	code calling that function.
> >
> > Authored-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
>
> There is no such thing as "Authored-by:".  If this patch was written by
> yinghai then it must be tagged as From:him at the top of the changelog
> and preferably has his signed-off-by: at the end.
>
> Please clarify?

Yes, you have it correct.  I had added the From: line but when I receive
the email, it's removed.

Why not have an "Authored-by"?  That would eliminate the sendmail program
from screwing it up?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/