Re: [PATCH 4/7] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting

[Will Drewry]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:21 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Adds seccomp and seccomp_filter status reporting to proc.
>> /proc/<pid>/status will include a Seccomp field, and
>> /proc/<pid>/seccomp_filter will provide read-only access
>> to the current filter and bitmask set for seccomp_filters.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/proc/array.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/proc/base.c  |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> I'm not againt seccomp_filter. but I dislike to increase /proc/<pid>/status mess.
> 1) it's read from a lot of applications, I don't want to worry about performance
> thing. 2) 99.99% user never use seccomp. this field is useless for them.
>
> Can't you make individual seccomp specific file?

Definitely.  Would it make sense to have /proc/<pid>/seccomp and
/proc/<pid>/seccomp_filter?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/