Re: [PATCH] Applying inappropriate ioctl operation on socket shouldreturn ENOTTY
From: Lifeng Sun
Date: Thu Apr 28 2011 - 04:49:37 EST
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/viotape.c b/drivers/char/viotape.c
>> index ad6e64a..a427d40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/viotape.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/viotape.c
>> @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static int viotap_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
>>
>> down(&reqSem);
>>
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> + ret = -ENOTTY;
>
> Again this messes up the returns because code assumes the initial
> default.
> The original code also has bugs too (wrong error off
> copy_*_user() again)
It seems alright.
- Lifeng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/