Re: [RFC] Regulator state after regulator_get

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:27:46PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm not sure what "supply_nasty" would mean?  This also doesn't seem
> > like something that we can set up per supply - it's going to affect the
> > whole regulator state, it's not something that only affects a single
> > supply.

> supply_nasty() would be used to define a regulator which is enabled by
> the boot loader when it shouldn't be, which is the actual problem.

That's *really* not a clear name.

> How should this regulator be turned off in the boot by the kernel?

Have you read my previous mail where I described the existing support
for doing this when we have a full set of information on the regualtors
in the systems?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/