Re: [PATCH 00/13] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!


> For testing swap-over-NBD, a machine was booted with 2G of RAM with a
> swapfile backed by NBD. 16*NUM_CPU processes were started that create
> anonymous memory mappings and read them linearly in a loop. The total
> size of the mappings were 4*PHYSICAL_MEMORY to use swap heavily under
> memory pressure. Without the patches, the machine locks up within
> minutes and runs to completion with them applied.
> 
> Comments?

Nice!

It  is easy to see why swapping needs these fixes, but... dirty memory
writeout is used for memory clearing, too. Are same changes neccessary
to make that safe?

(Perhaps raise 'max dirty %' for testing?)
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/