Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Replace spin_lock* with irqsavevariants
From: viresh kumar
Date: Fri Apr 29 2011 - 06:19:07 EST
On 04/28/2011 10:40 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:06:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> @@ -407,6 +410,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dw_dma_get_dst_addr);
>> static void dwc_handle_cyclic(struct dw_dma *dw, struct dw_dma_chan *dwc,
>> u32 status_block, u32 status_err, u32 status_xfer)
>> {
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> if (status_block & dwc->mask) {
>> void (*callback)(void *param);
>> void *callback_param;
>> @@ -418,9 +423,9 @@ static void dwc_handle_cyclic(struct dw_dma *dw, struct dw_dma_chan *dwc,
>> callback = dwc->cdesc->period_callback;
>> callback_param = dwc->cdesc->period_callback_param;
>> if (callback) {
>> - spin_unlock(&dwc->lock);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>> callback(callback_param);
>> - spin_lock(&dwc->lock);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
>
> I'm really not convinced that this is anywhere near correct. I'm
> surprised this doesn't spit out a compiler warning.
>
Sorry, this is done by mistake.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/