Re: [PATCH] rcu: optimize rcutiny
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Fri Apr 29 2011 - 07:36:49 EST
This time actually adding Thomas to CC... :-/
Thanx, Paul
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:54:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:23:45AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > rcu_sched_qs() currently calls local_irq_save()/local_irq_restore() up
> > to three times.
> >
> > Remove irq masking from rcu_qsctr_help() / invoke_rcu_kthread()
> > and do it once in rcu_sched_qs() / rcu_bh_qs()
> >
> > This generates smaller code as well.
> >
> > # size kernel/rcutiny.old.o kernel/rcutiny.new.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 2314 156 24 2494 9be kernel/rcutiny.old.o
> > 2250 156 24 2430 97e kernel/rcutiny.new.o
> >
> > Fix an outdated comment for rcu_qsctr_help()
> > Move invoke_rcu_kthread() definition before its use.
>
> Looks very nice! In theory, this does lengthen the time during which
> interrupts are disabled, but in practice I believe that that this would
> not be measurable. Adding Thomas on CC in case I am mistaken about
> the effect of longer irq-disable regions.
>
> In the meantime, I have queued this, and either way, thank you, Eric!
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcutiny.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny.c b/kernel/rcutiny.c
> > index 0c343b9..29eb349 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutiny.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutiny.c
> > @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
> > static struct task_struct *rcu_kthread_task;
> > static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rcu_kthread_wq);
> > static unsigned long have_rcu_kthread_work;
> > -static void invoke_rcu_kthread(void);
> >
> > /* Forward declarations for rcutiny_plugin.h. */
> > struct rcu_ctrlblk;
> > @@ -79,36 +78,45 @@ void rcu_exit_nohz(void)
> > #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ */
> >
> > /*
> > - * Helper function for rcu_qsctr_inc() and rcu_bh_qsctr_inc().
> > - * Also disable irqs to avoid confusion due to interrupt handlers
> > + * Helper function for rcu_sched_qs() and rcu_bh_qs().
> > + * Also irqs are disabled to avoid confusion due to interrupt handlers
> > * invoking call_rcu().
> > */
> > static int rcu_qsctr_help(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp)
> > {
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - local_irq_save(flags);
> > if (rcp->rcucblist != NULL &&
> > rcp->donetail != rcp->curtail) {
> > rcp->donetail = rcp->curtail;
> > - local_irq_restore(flags);
> > return 1;
> > }
> > - local_irq_restore(flags);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > + * Wake up rcu_kthread() to process callbacks now eligible for invocation
> > + * or to boost readers.
> > + */
> > +static void invoke_rcu_kthread(void)
> > +{
> > + have_rcu_kthread_work = 1;
> > + wake_up(&rcu_kthread_wq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > * Record an rcu quiescent state. And an rcu_bh quiescent state while we
> > * are at it, given that any rcu quiescent state is also an rcu_bh
> > * quiescent state. Use "+" instead of "||" to defeat short circuiting.
> > */
> > void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
> > {
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > if (rcu_qsctr_help(&rcu_sched_ctrlblk) +
> > rcu_qsctr_help(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk))
> > invoke_rcu_kthread();
> > + local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -116,8 +124,12 @@ void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
> > */
> > void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
> > {
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > if (rcu_qsctr_help(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk))
> > invoke_rcu_kthread();
> > + local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -208,20 +220,6 @@ static int rcu_kthread(void *arg)
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Wake up rcu_kthread() to process callbacks now eligible for invocation
> > - * or to boost readers.
> > - */
> > -static void invoke_rcu_kthread(void)
> > -{
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - local_irq_save(flags);
> > - have_rcu_kthread_work = 1;
> > - wake_up(&rcu_kthread_wq);
> > - local_irq_restore(flags);
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > * Wait for a grace period to elapse. But it is illegal to invoke
> > * synchronize_sched() from within an RCU read-side critical section.
> > * Therefore, any legal call to synchronize_sched() is a quiescent
> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/