[PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Apr 29 2011 - 11:31:45 EST


Code moved from numa_64.c has assumption that long is 64bit in several
places. This patch removes the assumption by using {s|u}64_t
explicity, using PFN_PHYS() for page number -> addr conversions and
adjusting printf formats.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 22dc9ed..b2fca54 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -192,13 +192,12 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
#endif

/* Initialize bootmem allocator for a node */
-static void __init
-setup_node_bootmem(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+static void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
{
- const u64 nd_low = (u64)MAX_DMA_PFN << PAGE_SHIFT;
- const u64 nd_high = (u64)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ const u64 nd_low = PFN_PHYS(MAX_DMA_PFN);
+ const u64 nd_high = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped);
const size_t nd_size = roundup(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
- unsigned long nd_pa;
+ u64 nd_pa;
int tnid;

/*
@@ -210,7 +209,7 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)

start = roundup(start, ZONE_ALIGN);

- printk(KERN_INFO "Initmem setup node %d %016lx-%016lx\n",
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Initmem setup node %d %016Lx-%016Lx\n",
nid, start, end);

/*
@@ -223,13 +222,13 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
nd_pa = memblock_find_in_range(nd_low, nd_high,
nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
if (nd_pa == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) {
- pr_err("Cannot find %lu bytes in node %d\n", nd_size, nid);
+ pr_err("Cannot find %zu bytes in node %d\n", nd_size, nid);
return;
}
memblock_x86_reserve_range(nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size, "NODE_DATA");

/* report and initialize */
- printk(KERN_INFO " NODE_DATA [%016lx - %016lx]\n",
+ printk(KERN_INFO " NODE_DATA [%016Lx - %016Lx]\n",
nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
if (tnid != nid)
@@ -257,7 +256,7 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
const u64 low = 0;
- const u64 high = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ const u64 high = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
int i, j, k;

for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
@@ -275,7 +274,7 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)

for (j = i + 1; j < mi->nr_blks; j++) {
struct numa_memblk *bj = &mi->blk[j];
- unsigned long start, end;
+ u64 start, end;

/*
* See whether there are overlapping blocks. Whine
@@ -313,7 +312,7 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
}
if (k < mi->nr_blks)
continue;
- printk(KERN_INFO "NUMA: Node %d [%Lx,%Lx) + [%Lx,%Lx) -> [%lx,%lx)\n",
+ printk(KERN_INFO "NUMA: Node %d [%Lx,%Lx) + [%Lx,%Lx) -> [%Lx,%Lx)\n",
bi->nid, bi->start, bi->end, bj->start, bj->end,
start, end);
bi->start = start;
@@ -378,7 +377,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
cnt++;
size = cnt * cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);

- phys = memblock_find_in_range(0, (u64)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ phys = memblock_find_in_range(0, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped),
size, PAGE_SIZE);
if (phys == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) {
pr_warning("NUMA: Warning: can't allocate distance table!\n");
@@ -456,24 +455,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_distance);
*/
static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_memory(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
- unsigned long numaram, e820ram;
+ u64 numaram, e820ram;
int i;

numaram = 0;
for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
- unsigned long s = mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned long e = mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ u64 s = mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ u64 e = mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
numaram += e - s;
numaram -= __absent_pages_in_range(mi->blk[i].nid, s, e);
- if ((long)numaram < 0)
+ if ((s64)numaram < 0)
numaram = 0;
}

e820ram = max_pfn - (memblock_x86_hole_size(0,
- max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ PFN_PHYS(max_pfn)) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
/* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */
- if ((long)(e820ram - numaram) >= (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: nodes only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n",
+ if ((s64)(e820ram - numaram) >= (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: nodes only cover %LuMB of your %LuMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n",
(numaram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20,
(e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20);
return false;
@@ -503,7 +502,7 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)

/* Finally register nodes. */
for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
- u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
u64 end = 0;

for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
@@ -595,11 +594,11 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n",
numa_off ? "NUMA turned off" : "No NUMA configuration found");
- printk(KERN_INFO "Faking a node at %016lx-%016lx\n",
- 0LU, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Faking a node at %016Lx-%016Lx\n",
+ 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn));

node_set(0, numa_nodes_parsed);
- numa_add_memblk(0, 0, (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ numa_add_memblk(0, 0, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn));

return 0;
}
--
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/