Re: Undoing module RONX protection fix

From: Jan Glauber
Date: Fri Apr 29 2011 - 12:36:23 EST


On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:11:16PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:43:21 +0200, Jan Glauber <jang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:06:39PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:08:20 +0200, Jan Glauber <jang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > How about this?
> > > >
> > > > To be honest I don't like the inverse naming like in unset no-execute
> > > > too much, it makes me feel dizzy. But I wanted to keep the changes
> > > > minimal.
> > >
> > > Yes, it should probably just be called protect_module_pages and
> > > unprotect_module_pages. The current names provide far too much
> > > information.
> > >
> > > But going back a bit, how did we end up with a NULL mod->module_init and
> > > yet module->init_text_size, mod->init_size or mod->init_ro_size
> > > non-zero?
> >
> > printk'ing this reveals that mod->init_ro_size is not 0 but 0x1000.
> > Therefore the first page was modified.
> >
> > Looks like init_ro_size is missing the reset to zero at the end of the init_module
> > syscall. Next patch ? ;-
>
> Yes, that seems like a much cleaner and clearer fix to me...

Rusty, I'm not sure if I should resend a merged patch or not, going for the
later so you can apply on top of what you might have. If you would appreciate a
merged patch more please let me know...

Cheers,
Jan
------

Reset mod->init_ro_size to zero after the init part of a module is unloaded.
That makes the check if a module part exists in the unprotect functions
superfluous so they can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/module.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1609,8 +1609,6 @@ static void set_section_ro_nx(void *base

static void unset_module_core_ro_nx(struct module *mod)
{
- if (mod->module_core == NULL)
- return;
set_page_attributes(mod->module_core + mod->core_text_size,
mod->module_core + mod->core_size,
set_memory_x);
@@ -1621,8 +1619,6 @@ static void unset_module_core_ro_nx(stru

static void unset_module_init_ro_nx(struct module *mod)
{
- if (mod->module_init == NULL)
- return;
set_page_attributes(mod->module_init + mod->init_text_size,
mod->module_init + mod->init_size,
set_memory_x);
@@ -2941,6 +2937,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(init_module, void __user
module_free(mod, mod->module_init);
mod->module_init = NULL;
mod->init_size = 0;
+ mod->init_ro_size = 0;
mod->init_text_size = 0;
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/