Re: [PATCH 10/10] mach-ux500: update and move cpufreq driver

[Linus Walleij]

2011/5/10 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> Haven't had chance to really read much patches the last few days
> (travelling until the 16th).  Due to the patch collisions we'll keep
> seeing on kconfig/Makefiles, should these go via the cpufreq tree,
> or do people want to still push them through their respective arch trees ?

I pushed a patch series yesterday that basically deactivates the
cpufreq driver in the mach-ux500, moves it over to drivers/cpufreq,
updates it, then reactivates it in the new place with a patch to
the Makefile.

Of these changes only the last patch will collide with your tree,
so I pushed all of them except that one to linux-next.

The last patch I plan to submit to Torvalds directly after both
trees have gone into the merge window.

Can you please look into this and ACK the patches if they
seem OK?

Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/