Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership

[Barry Song]

Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for your reply.

2011/5/19 Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Barry Song wrote:
>
>> does it mean if we want to add a new SoC plat/mach, we will send
>> patches againest this tree?
>
> Yes. ÂOr against latest mainline tree from Linus.
>
>> will this tree merge into rmk's tree? then rmk's tree will only manage
>> arm common codes?
>
> Something like that. ÂThe exact details will be fleshed out as we go.
> The idea is to give a round of review from a higher point of view to
> make sure no opportunities for code reuse is missed, etc. ÂThe mechanics
> of how this code transitions from this tree into mainline during the
> merge window is secondary.

i asked this because we wanted to send the source codes of
CSR(http://www.csr.com) to upstream as i have told you in LDS. it
looks like we need to follow the below new changes to make our source
codes acceptable?
1. arm device tree
2. new pinmux framework from Linus Walleij
3. move GPIO from plat/mach to drivers/gpio?

>
>
> Nicolas
-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/