Re: [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: remove the use of writeq, since writeq isnot atomic

[Roland Dreier]

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Milton Miller <miltonm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> So the real question should be why is x86-32 supplying a broken writeq
> instead of letting drivers work out what to do it when needed?

Sounds a lot like what I was asking a couple of years ago :)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/19/164

But Ingo insisted that non-atomic writeq would be fine:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/19/167

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/