Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:58, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_io.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_io.c
>> @@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ int ft_queue_data_in(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â "xid <0x%x>, remaining <0x%x>, "
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â "lso_max <0x%x>\n",
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â __func__, fp, ep->xid,
>> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â remaining, lport->lso_max);
>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (unsigned int)remaining,
>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â lport->lso_max);
>
> Given that "remaining" really is a length, surely it makes more sense to

Exactly my comments ...

> print it with %zd than to cast it and print it with %x ...

... except that size_t is unsigned, so %zu would be a little bit better.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

            Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®å’i