Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] Add support for the Philips SA56004temperature sensor.
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Mon May 23 2011 - 09:55:01 EST
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:08:42AM -0400, Stijn Devriendt (sdevrien) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> > > if (!name) { /* identification failed */
> > > @@ -1372,6 +1401,18 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client
> > *new_client,
> > > /* Set maximum conversion rate */
> > > data->max_convrate = lm90_params[data->kind].max_convrate;
> > >
> > > + if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT) {
> > > + if (lm90_params[data->kind].local_ext_offset > 0)
> > > + data->local_ext_offset =
> > > +
> lm90_params[data->kind].local_ext_offset;
> > > + else {
> > > + dev_err(&new_client->dev,
> > > + "Invalid temperature extension register. "
> > > + "Accuracy may be limited.\n");
> > > + data->flags &= (~LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT);
> > > + }
> >
> > Either { } in both branches of the if statement, or none.
> > ( ) around ~LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT is unnecessary.
> >
> > I see it as BUG if LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT is set but local_ext_offset
> isn't.
> > That should be found during coding (or code review), and not be
> exported
> > to the user. So, from my perspective, the check is unnecessary. I'll
> leave
> > that up to Jean to decide, though.
> >
> Do you think a BUG_ON() would be better suited here?
>
I would just use
data->local_ext_offset = lm90_params[data->kind].local_ext_offset;
without any conditionals (the if statements just add code without real value),
followed by
BUG_ON((data->flags & LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT) && data->local_ext_offset == 0);
if you want to be sure.
> > In addition to the above, your patch generates several checkpatch
> errors
> > (trailing whitespace). Please fix.
> I recall letting checkpatch yell at me... I'll have another round of it
> to
> be sure.
>
Try to apply your own patch, and you'll see git complain about whitespace errors.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/