Re: [PATCH 3/5] oom: oom-killer don't use proportion of system-raminternally

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

(2011/05/24 7:48), David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > I already suggested an alternative patch to CAI Qian to greatly increase
> > the granularity of the oom score from a range of 0-1000 to 0-10000 to
> > differentiate between tasks within 0.01% of available memory (16MB on CAI
> > Qian's 16GB system).  I'll propose this officially in a separate email.
>
> This is an alternative patch as earlier proposed with suggested
> improvements from Minchan.  CAI, would it be possible to test this out on
> your usecase?
>
> I'm indifferent to the actual scale of OOM_SCORE_MAX_FACTOR; it could be
> 10 as proposed in this patch or even increased higher for higher
> resolution.

I did explain why your proposal is unacceptable.

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1378837#1378837

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/