Re: [PATCH] posix clocks: correct error value in posix_clock_poll()

[Richard Cochran]

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:51:47PM +0200, Nicolas Kaiser wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> It looks to me like -ENODEV might not be a good return value
> in poll(). Would POLLERR be the correct one in this case?
> 
>  kernel/time/posix-clock.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-clock.c b/kernel/time/posix-clock.c
> index c340ca6..2424d3f 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-clock.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static unsigned int posix_clock_poll(struct file *fp, poll_table *wait)
>  	int result = 0;
>  
>  	if (!clk)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +		return POLLERR;

The condition (!clk) is only satisfied when 'zombie' is set,
indicating that the dynamic clock has disappeared. That is why the
file operations uniformly return ENODEV. So, I think it makes sense
the way that it is.

In addition, man 2 poll says,

   POLLERR
          Error condition (output only).

so using that error code would be misleading, IMHO.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/