Re: [PATCH 03/10] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE

From: Pedro Alves
Date: Tue May 24 2011 - 08:36:18 EST


On Tuesday 24 May 2011 13:00:13, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:49:58AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > A couple interface questions that just crossed my mind:
> >
> > - on a fork/vfork/clone, if PTRACE_EVENT_FORK|VFORK|CLONE have been
> > enabled, will the tracer still see the new child stop with a
> > SIGSTOP, or will it see a PTRACE_EVENT_INTERRUPT?
>
> This won't change, so SIGSTOP although we probably want to improve it
> such that this can be distinguished from SIGTRAP from userland.

(I assume you meant SIGSTOP from userland.) So that if a SIGSTOPs
from userland is sent before the tracer waits for the child, the
tracer sees a siginfo corresponding to the userland SIGSTOP? Sounds
like it might work.

> > - is PTRACE_INTERRUPT on PTRACE_TRACEME-traced-child planed to
> > be allowed (for convenience)?
> > A PTRACE_O_TRACEINTERRUPT, or some such PTRACE_SETOPTIONS
> > option might be necessary to get PTRACE_EVENT_INTERRUPT instead
> > of SIGSTOP in the point above.
>
> I'm currently leaning toward deprecating PTRACE_TRACEME. If a task
> can PTRACE_TRACEME, it may as well just do pause(2) and let the parent
> SEIZE it.

Debuggers will want to nurse the child through a couple of
execs (shell, then real debuggee), so that scheme requires a bit
more synchronization, because SEIZE hides the magic exec SIGTRAP,
and so the tracer needs to set the O_TRACEXEC option before the first
exec, and make sure external signals don't break the synchronization.
Reading/writing to/from blocking pipes for that initial synchronization
is what GDB uses instead for e.g., hpux/ttrace support, which looks
similar to using PTRACE_SEIZE for PTRACE_TRACEME. A bit more
cumbersome, though doable, I suppose.

Thanks.

--
Pedro Alves
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/