Re: [PATCH 4/4] writeback: reduce per-bdi dirty threshold ramp uptime

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue May 24 2011 - 08:38:43 EST


On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 14:24 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Again, if we then measure t in the same events as x, such that:
>
> t = \Sum_i x_i

> However, if you start measuring t differently that breaks, and the
> result is no longer normalized and thus not suitable as a proportion.

Ah, I made a mistake there, your proposal would keep the above relation
true, but the discrete periods t_i wouldn't be uniform.

So disregard the non normalized criticism.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/