Re: [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: reduce bit operations in cfq_choose_req()
From: Justin TerAvest
Date: Tue May 24 2011 - 13:34:43 EST
Why make this change? Are we that sensitive to the number of operations?
It makes the code a bit harder to read, I think.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Reduce the number of bit operations in cfq_choose_req() on average
> (and worst) cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index 151a050e692c..a79e62063144 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -665,15 +665,11 @@ cfq_choose_req(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct request *rq1, struct request *rq2,
> if (rq2 == NULL)
> return rq1;
>
> - if (rq_is_sync(rq1) && !rq_is_sync(rq2))
> - return rq1;
> - else if (rq_is_sync(rq2) && !rq_is_sync(rq1))
> - return rq2;
> - if ((rq1->cmd_flags & REQ_META) && !(rq2->cmd_flags & REQ_META))
> - return rq1;
> - else if ((rq2->cmd_flags & REQ_META) &&
> - !(rq1->cmd_flags & REQ_META))
> - return rq2;
> + if (rq_is_sync(rq1) != rq_is_sync(rq2))
> + return rq_is_sync(rq1) ? rq1 : rq2;
> +
> + if ((rq1->cmd_flags ^ rq2->cmd_flags) & REQ_META)
> + return rq1->cmd_flags & REQ_META ? rq1 : rq2;
>
> s1 = blk_rq_pos(rq1);
> s2 = blk_rq_pos(rq2);
> --
> 1.7.5.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/