Re: linux-next: Tree for May 24 (ratelimits, CONFIG_PRINTK notenabled)
From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue May 24 2011 - 15:49:47 EST
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 15:32 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:49:48 -0700
> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:33 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> Adding <linux/ratelimit.h> to <asm-generic/bug.h> causes other problems:
> > Yup, that's not a good solution.
> Please come up with a fix or I'll have to revert, thanks Joe.
I have some errands to run for awhile.
Probably a revert today and another patch set tomorrow
might be best.
This seems to work and doesn't cause any extra state to be
instantiated when !CONFIG_PRINTK. What do you think?
#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
#define WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(condition, state) \
WARN_ON((condition) && __ratelimit(state))
#define __WARN_RATELIMIT(condition, state, format...) \
({ \
int rtn = 0; \
if (unlikely(__ratelimit(state))) \
rtn = WARN(condition, format); \
rtn; \
})
#define WARN_RATELIMIT(condition, format...) \
({ \
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs, \
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, \
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST); \
__WARN_RATELIMIT(condition, &_rs, format); \
})
#else
#define WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(condition, state) \
WARN_ON(condition)
#define __WARN_RATELIMIT(condition, state, format...) \
({ \
int rtn = WARN(condition, format); \
rtn; \
})
#define WARN_RATELIMIT(condition, format...) \
({ \
int rtn = WARN(condition, format); \
rtn; \
})
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/